Tamil actor Vijay once again appeared before the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in New Delhi, marking his second appearance in connection with the ongoing probe related to the Karur stampede incident. His visit has reignited public attention, not only because of his immense popularity but also due to the sensitive nature of the case being examined by the central agency.
According to information available, Vijay was summoned to clarify certain aspects linked to the Karur stampede, an incident that resulted in public concern and raised serious questions about crowd management, event coordination, and responsibility. The CBI’s repeated summons indicate that the agency is conducting a detailed and methodical investigation to establish clarity on all connected factors.
This was not Vijay’s first interaction with the investigating agency. He had earlier appeared before the CBI and provided responses to a series of questions. The latest appearance is understood to be a continuation of that earlier questioning, suggesting that investigators sought further explanations or confirmations based on previous statements and newly examined material.
Sources familiar with the inquiry indicate that the questions posed to Vijay revolved around the planning, permissions, and communication surrounding the event linked to the Karur stampede. Investigators are said to have focused on how the event was organised, the flow of people, and whether adequate preventive measures were discussed or implemented to avoid overcrowding.
Another key area of questioning reportedly involved Vijay’s awareness of ground-level arrangements and whether any advisories or warnings were conveyed prior to the incident. The agency is believed to be cross-verifying statements with other testimonies and documentary evidence collected during the probe.
During the prolonged questioning, it is understood that certain queries were repeated to ensure consistency in responses. Such repetition is a standard investigative practice, aimed at identifying discrepancies or gaining clearer insight into complex sequences of events. Sources suggest that Vijay sought time to carefully respond to some of these questions, particularly those involving timelines and coordination responsibilities.
The Karur stampede issue has been a matter of intense scrutiny, as it raised broader concerns about public safety during high-profile gatherings. The CBI’s involvement underscores the seriousness of the case and the need to determine accountability without bias or presumption.
Vijay’s second appearance before the CBI has naturally attracted widespread attention among fans and political observers alike. While supporters have maintained that he is fully cooperating with the investigation, critics argue that repeated questioning highlights unresolved aspects of the case.
It is important to note that appearing before an investigating agency does not imply guilt. Legal experts point out that summoning individuals multiple times is common in cases involving complex circumstances, multiple stakeholders, and large public events. The process is intended to establish facts rather than draw conclusions prematurely.
As of now, no formal charges have been announced, and the investigation remains ongoing. The CBI is expected to continue examining all relevant angles before arriving at its findings. Vijay, meanwhile, has not made any detailed public statement regarding the substance of the questioning, choosing instead to comply with the legal process.
The case continues to evolve, with public interest remaining high due to the intersection of celebrity influence, public safety, and institutional accountability. Further developments are awaited as the investigation progresses
